Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting
  • Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:27:05 -0500

Seeing as I was called out specifically in the initial post, I figured I
should chime in. Adding such a time limit just seems arbitrary to me. I’ll be
voting for no change to the current system, barring some extraordinary
argument. Is there any precedent for such a system in other democratic
setups?

Jonah

> On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:05 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>
> Would probably be best instead of a yes/no to do something like:
>
> * 1 year
> * 8 months
> * 6 months
> * Less than 6 months, determined by a separate proposal
> * No changes.
>
> If "less than 6 months" is chosen, we can do a separate proposal with
>
> * 3 months
> * 1 months
> * No changes.
>
> If "no changes" wins in either case, proposals such as this cannot be
> revisited for 6 months after the votes are counted.
>
> Would you agree that this is a better way?
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:09:30 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki
>> <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> Was thinking 6-8 months. Eight seems fair.
>>
>> ~
>> Sebastian Makowiecki
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 6 months?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Dan Q
>>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:52:12 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki
>>> <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The idea is good, one year to much, 3 months to little, in my
>>>> opinion
>>>> that is for what is worth.
>>>>
>>>> ~
>>>> Sebastian Makowiecki
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Rouben <rouben AT rouben.net> wrote:
>>>>> 1 year might be a bit too much... perhaps 1-3 months?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rouben
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Daniel Quintiliani
>>>> <danq AT runbox.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There has been a problem of people trying to hold new votes too
>>>>>> recently after their proposals lose. This includes Jonah's
>>>> proposals
>>>>>> to replace IRC with Discord and Sympa with Discourse, and someone
>>>>>> who lost I think the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the
>>>>>> .free/.libre thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting period before
>>>> anyone
>>>>>> can bring proposals back up for a new vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Dan Q
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page