Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

I've heard that said about UDRP, actually.  If you lose, adjust something a 
little and start over.

To Jonah, you suggested in the past revisiting votes you lost on, and are 
doing that now with Discourse and Discord.
To the person I forget who who was unhappy about .front being voted out, he 
wanted to vote again (nothing came of it, possibly it was just complaining)
And as for myself, I did the same thing for .free/.libre, and we held a vote 
for a "nonbinding suggestion" that the TLD owner rejected anyway.

It's just good to have a fixed time limit of some sort on this issue, to keep 
things stable and ensure integrity of the organization, just like how we 
voted on your proposals for voting procedures. I think it should be more 
long-term than short-term, but others here disagree.

--

-Dan Q


On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:27:05 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:

> Seeing as I was called out specifically in the initial post, I figured I 
> should chime in. Adding such a time limit just seems arbitrary to me. I’ll 
> be voting for no change to the current system, barring some extraordinary 
> argument. Is there any precedent for such a system in other democratic 
> setups? 
> 
> Jonah
> 
> > On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:05 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Would probably be best instead of a yes/no to do something like:
> > 
> > * 1 year
> > * 8 months
> > * 6 months 
> > * Less than 6 months, determined by a separate proposal
> > * No changes.
> > 
> > If "less than 6 months" is chosen, we can do a separate proposal with
> > 
> >  * 3 months
> >  * 1 months
> >  * No changes. 
> > 
> > If "no changes" wins in either case, proposals such as this cannot be 
> > revisited for 6 months after the votes are counted.
> > 
> > Would you agree that this is a better way?
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > 
> >> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:09:30 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki 
> >> <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Was thinking 6-8 months. Eight seems fair.
> >> 
> >> ~
> >> Sebastian Makowiecki
> >> 
> >> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>> 6 months?
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> 
> >>> -Dan Q
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:52:12 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki 
> >>> <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> The idea is good, one year to much, 3 months to little, in my 
> >>>> opinion
> >>>> that is for what is worth.
> >>>> 
> >>>> ~
> >>>> Sebastian Makowiecki
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Rouben <rouben AT rouben.net> wrote:
> >>>>> 1 year might be a bit too much... perhaps 1-3 months?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Rouben
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Daniel Quintiliani 
> >>>> <danq AT runbox.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> There has been a problem of people trying to hold new votes too
> >>>>>> recently after their proposals lose. This includes Jonah's 
> >>>> proposals
> >>>>>> to replace IRC with Discord and Sympa with Discourse, and someone
> >>>>>> who lost I think the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the
> >>>>>> .free/.libre thing.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting period before 
> >>>> anyone
> >>>>>> can bring proposals back up for a new vote.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> -Dan Q
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --------
> >>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >>>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --------
> >>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> --------
> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org