Discuss mailing list

["Jack Ternan" <jackist AT email.com>]

As I mentioned when we were voting on Jonah's rule changes, adding procedural hurdles does not make any sense without an umpire of sorts.  Who is going to decide if the proposal is a duplicate or altered enough to be a new proposal?  If someone proposes the exact same proposal a day after the prior vote (in violation of the proposed time limit), how is a second vote going to be prevented?

 

Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 7:39 PM
From: Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting

It may be good to have to be based on the type of proposal, e.g. TLD
vs. infrastructure proposals.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Sebastian Makowiecki
<soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> I suppose it just makes sense that failed proposals should not be repeated
> too soon. A 'no' means 'no' (and a 'yes' means 'yes'), not 'perhaps in the
> near future'. Some cooldown period would ensure that same proposals cannot
> be suggested too frequently.
>
> I can see how to some a period of a year or even 8 months can be quite too
> long for some (especially in today's world). I suppose a shorter period
> would make more sense, where there is a grace period after each proposal,
> yet also the "Great Project of OpenNIC" remains reformable.
>
> I'd like to change my suggestion to 4 months of 'cool-down' period (I
> previosly suggested 8 months).
> ~ Sebastian Makowiecki
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>
> As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were voted
> into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between duplicate
> proposals will ensure integrity and stability. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9 Jul 2018
> 21:44:07 -0700, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
>
> I should have added in my last email: To whom does this make a difference? ~
> Ole On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT) "Daniel Quintiliani"
> <danq AT runbox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a problem of people trying
> to hold new > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This > includes
> Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord > and Sympa with Discourse,
> and someone who lost I think > the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the
> .free/.libre > thing. > > I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting
> period > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote. > > What
> do you think? > > -- > > -Dan Q -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC
> Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe
> by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org