Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were voted 
into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between duplicate 
proposals will ensure integrity and stability. 

--

-Dan Q

On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:44:07 -0700, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:

> I should have added in my last email:
> To whom does this make a difference?
> 
> ~ Ole
> 
> 
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
> "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > There has been a problem of people trying to hold new
> > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This
> > includes Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord
> > and Sympa with Discourse, and someone who lost I think
> > the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the .free/.libre
> > thing.
> > 
> > I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting period
> > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org