Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:39:12 -0400

It may be good to have to be based on the type of proposal, e.g. TLD
vs. infrastructure proposals.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Sebastian Makowiecki
<soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> I suppose it just makes sense that failed proposals should not be repeated
> too soon. A 'no' means 'no' (and a 'yes' means 'yes'), not 'perhaps in the
> near future'. Some cooldown period would ensure that same proposals cannot
> be suggested too frequently.
>
> I can see how to some a period of a year or even 8 months can be quite too
> long for some (especially in today's world). I suppose a shorter period
> would make more sense, where there is a grace period after each proposal,
> yet also the "Great Project of OpenNIC" remains reformable.
>
> I'd like to change my suggestion to 4 months of 'cool-down' period (I
> previosly suggested 8 months).
> ~ Sebastian Makowiecki
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>
> As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were voted
> into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between duplicate
> proposals will ensure integrity and stability. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9 Jul 2018
> 21:44:07 -0700, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
>
> I should have added in my last email: To whom does this make a difference? ~
> Ole On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT) "Daniel Quintiliani"
> <danq AT runbox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a problem of people trying
> to hold new > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This > includes
> Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord > and Sympa with Discourse,
> and someone who lost I think > the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the
> .free/.libre > thing. > > I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting
> period > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote. > > What
> do you think? > > -- > > -Dan Q -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC
> Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe
> by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page