Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

That would just make things confusing in a "what counts as what" way.

--

-Dan Q

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:39:12 -0400, Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com> wrote:

> It may be good to have to be based on the type of proposal, e.g. TLD
> vs. infrastructure proposals.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Sebastian Makowiecki
> <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> > I suppose it just makes sense that failed proposals should not be repeated
> > too soon. A 'no' means 'no' (and a 'yes' means 'yes'), not 'perhaps in the
> > near future'. Some cooldown period would ensure that same proposals cannot
> > be suggested too frequently.
> >
> > I can see how to some a period of a year or even 8 months can be quite too
> > long for some (especially in today's world). I suppose a shorter period
> > would make more sense, where there is a grace period after each proposal,
> > yet also the "Great Project of OpenNIC" remains reformable.
> >
> > I'd like to change my suggestion to 4 months of 'cool-down' period (I
> > previosly suggested 8 months).
> > ~ Sebastian Makowiecki
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jul, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were voted
> > into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between duplicate
> > proposals will ensure integrity and stability. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9 Jul 
> > 2018
> > 21:44:07 -0700, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
> >
> > I should have added in my last email: To whom does this make a 
> > difference? ~
> > Ole On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT) "Daniel Quintiliani"
> > <danq AT runbox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a problem of people 
> > trying
> > to hold new > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This > 
> > includes
> > Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord > and Sympa with Discourse,
> > and someone who lost I think > the .front TLD, and I did so myself with 
> > the
> > .free/.libre > thing. > > I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting
> > period > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote. > > 
> > What
> > do you think? > > -- > > -Dan Q -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC
> > Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> > -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe
> > by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org