Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Why Bother?

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Why Bother?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.co.uk>
  • To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Why Bother?
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:00:40 +0100
  • Mail-reply-to: <peter AT greenpete.co.uk>

Interesting point! :-) Anyone?

Peter

On 12.07.2012 20:32, Bjorn Peeters wrote:

I suppose they do, but, from the project website:

By using OpenNIC, you are supporting a free and censorship free internet.
OpenNIC has been used in many countries to liberate themselves from the
censorship placed on the DNS services from their governments or ISPs.

So, if the registries would disallow this, would it not fall under
censorship,
and thus in breach with the idea of opennic?

FROM: Sam Dodrill [7]
SENT: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:24 PM
TO: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org [8]
SUBJECT: Re: [opennic-discuss] Why Bother?

Don't the registries have to deal with that?
Sam Dodrill
mailto:shadow.h511 AT gmail.com [9]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Bjorn Peeters <bjorn AT bjornpeeters.be
[10]> wrote:

playing a bit in the role of devil's advocate (i seem to be making a
hobby out of that lately);

As you say, freedom of speech is one of the most important things - but
also one of the most grey areas on the web.
There are some things, which although they could fall under free
speech, are by many regarded upon as intolerable.

How would we (well, ok, you guys, cause i'm still not running a t2 -
coming this year, promise!) go about those things?

i.e.: the most current example is how anonymous is grouping together to
attack boards to "talk about pedophilia".
don't get me wrong: i don't care much for such sites, but where is the
line?
Anonymous is making clear, that for them, the "talking about
pedophilia" is one bridge too far.

If there is actual sharing of illegal things, the line is very clear:
intolerable.
However, if there is only talking: does this fall under free speech, or
would it be intolerable?

Again, the only clear action on the public web has been that of
Anonymous: they are for free speech,
but do not consider these things to be part of free speech.

Due to their action, i could imagine (though i doubt it) that one of
those sites would move to opennic,
because it's currently "less visible" - excuse the phrasing.

How would we all respond to such a site, in light of the idea of free
speech?

- the devil has spoken :)

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- From: Peter Green
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:06 PM
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org [2]
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Why Bother?

"I'm curious what makes the various people involved with OpenNIC take
the
time to try to change the way the internet works?"

I wasn't aware we are, are we?

As for why I got involved in OpenNIC, I believe keeping the Wibbly
Wobbly
Web open (not the Internets, that's a different thing, though equally
as
valuable) and free is essential for
free speech and freedom in general.

My question would be, "why wouldn't you do something for the greater
good,
particular, freedom of speech?"

Peter

On 10.07.2012 04:01, woodq11 AT gmail.com [3] wrote:

I'm curious what makes the various people involved with OpenNIC take
the
time
to try to change the way the internet works?

It's definitely not easy or even guaranteed to be successful
(depending
on
what your definition of successful is, I suppose..)

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing
discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org [1]

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing
discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org [4]

-----
Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com [5]
Versie: 2012.0.2195 / Virusdatabase: 2437/5127 - datum van uitgifte:
07/12/12

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org [6]

Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com [11]
Versie: 2012.0.2195 / Virusdatabase: 2437/5127 - datum van uitgifte:
07/12/12


Links:
------
[1] mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
[2] mailto:discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
[3] mailto:woodq11 AT gmail.com
[4] mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
[5] http://www.avg.com
[6] mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
[7] mailto:shadow.h511 AT gmail.com
[8] mailto:discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
[9] mailto:shadow.h511 AT gmail.com
[10] mailto:bjorn AT bjornpeeters.be
[11] http://www.avg.com



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page