Discuss mailing list

[nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>]

As i explained. It's a vote. And i'll repeat as my vote on this 
proposal:

I object.

Still i think it would be wise to post this as a new thread, so people 
see it, most email client have a "ignore thread" function to filter 
stuff.

Am Montag, 12. November 2012 18:10:43 schrieb Multiwebsphere:
> Dear nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, Open Nic (all),
>
> We would like to co-operate with Open Nic....that counts for
> AltRootfoundation.org as well as Multiwebsphere.com
>
> But in order to cooperate, in Europe we have to know what you
> want.....what you statutes are...with whom we kan make agreements.
>
> If Open Nic is a non-organisation, a kind of anarchistic group that
> does formally not exist (no legal body) and where we do not know the
> decision procedure, it is more difficult to cooperate.
>
> Is it correct open nic has appr. 1000 'members' who are not official
> members, and that decision making goes by referendum? Ok, that is a
> basis.
>
> Question 'from Europe': would you like to cooperate with us?
>
> Advantages I can imagine:
> Altrootfoundation could 'cover' your existing extensions - you remain
> the Intellectual Property owner of your extensions
>
> Multiwebsphere can decide to include or exclude your Open Nic
> extensions in 1) MultiWebSphere - Brower 2) SEARZ search engine 3)
> plug in for all browsers. Any preference?
>
> Altrootfoundation is not for profit, Multiwebsphere is.
>
> I am looking forward to reactions.
>
> best regards,
>
> Philippe Blankert
> berlin AT multiwebphere.com
> 12 nov 2012
>
>
>> The way things get decided on OpenNIC is in a democratic vote. It does
>> not matter how many people vote for something as long as there is more
>> opposing votes then there are votes in favor of it. There are close to
>> 300 people on the mailing list and all of them have a say in this.
>> However, if they don't respond, then they are to be rated as
>> abstentions, after a certain amount of time. And it's not just me and
>> Alex H.  who object to altroot/mws association with OpenNIC.
>>
>> Now, if you would want to request an informal association with OpenNIC,
>> you'll have to post a proposal for it and call for a vote. At least
>> that's how i understand it.
>>
>> Am Montag, 12. November 2012 12:07:11 schrieb JP Blankert (Thuis PC):
>>> Dear Alex, nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, and other Open Nic
>>> members,
>>>
>>> What is the decision procedure in an informal association as Open NIC,
>>> re. exclsuion?
>>>
>>> All I mail are possibilities to generate and host domain names outside
>>> ICANN. That is also exactly you objective.
>>>
>>> That is exactly the topic I am posting about, so we are fully in line!
>>>
>>> If a little majority of Open Nic (just a guess) would be 'jealous', is
>>> not my therapeutic task to look at that.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Philippe Blankert
>>> 12 nov. 2012 12 hrs 05 CEST
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> David "nanashiRei" Marner
>> Founder of YaS-Online.net
>> Service from Gamers, for Gamers.
>>
>> PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp
>> Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp
>>
>

--
David "nanashiRei" Marner
Founder of YaS-Online.net
Service from Gamers, for Gamers.

PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp
Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature