Discuss mailing list

[Anner van Hardenbroek <dwlnetnl AT gmail.com>]

I object.

On Monday 12 November 2012 at 19:34, nanashiRei wrote:

As i explained. It's a vote. And i'll repeat as my vote on this

proposal:

I object.

Still i think it would be wise to post this as a new thread, so people

see it, most email client have a "ignore thread" function to filter

stuff.

Am Montag, 12. November 2012 18:10:43 schrieb Multiwebsphere:

Dear nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, Open Nic (all),

We would like to co-operate with Open Nic....that counts for

AltRootfoundation.org as well as Multiwebsphere.com

But in order to cooperate, in Europe we have to know what you

want.....what you statutes are...with whom we kan make agreements.

If Open Nic is a non-organisation, a kind of anarchistic group that

does formally not exist (no legal body) and where we do not know the

decision procedure, it is more difficult to cooperate.

Is it correct open nic has appr. 1000 'members' who are not official

members, and that decision making goes by referendum? Ok, that is a

basis.

Question 'from Europe': would you like to cooperate with us?

Advantages I can imagine:

Altrootfoundation could 'cover' your existing extensions - you remain

the Intellectual Property owner of your extensions

Multiwebsphere can decide to include or exclude your Open Nic

extensions in 1) MultiWebSphere - Brower 2) SEARZ search engine 3)

plug in for all browsers. Any preference?

Altrootfoundation is not for profit, Multiwebsphere is.

I am looking forward to reactions.

best regards,

Philippe Blankert

berlin AT multiwebphere.com

12 nov 2012

The way things get decided on OpenNIC is in a democratic vote. It does

not matter how many people vote for something as long as there is more

opposing votes then there are votes in favor of it. There are close to

300 people on the mailing list and all of them have a say in this.

However, if they don't respond, then they are to be rated as

abstentions, after a certain amount of time. And it's not just me and

Alex H. who object to altroot/mws association with OpenNIC.

Now, if you would want to request an informal association with OpenNIC,

you'll have to post a proposal for it and call for a vote. At least

that's how i understand it.

Am Montag, 12. November 2012 12:07:11 schrieb JP Blankert (Thuis PC):

Dear Alex, nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, and other Open Nic

members,

What is the decision procedure in an informal association as Open NIC,

re. exclsuion?

All I mail are possibilities to generate and host domain names outside

ICANN. That is also exactly you objective.

That is exactly the topic I am posting about, so we are fully in line!

If a little majority of Open Nic (just a guess) would be 'jealous', is

not my therapeutic task to look at that.

Kind regards,

Philippe Blankert

12 nov. 2012 12 hrs 05 CEST

--

David "nanashiRei" Marner

Founder of YaS-Online.net

Service from Gamers, for Gamers.

PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp

Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp

--

David "nanashiRei" Marner

Founder of YaS-Online.net

Service from Gamers, for Gamers.

PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp

Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp