Discuss mailing list

["Panesar, Amrit" <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>]

I agree with this, Please put the proposal (proper grammar is a plus)
in its own thread, so it can be properly discussed.
If you are serious about this, please differ to someone who has better
English spelling and grammar, Mr. Philippe Blankert, else we will be
unable to take you seriously.

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM, nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com> wrote:
> As i explained. It's a vote. And i'll repeat as my vote on this
> proposal:
>
> I object.
>
> Still i think it would be wise to post this as a new thread, so people
> see it, most email client have a "ignore thread" function to filter
> stuff.
>
> Am Montag, 12. November 2012 18:10:43 schrieb Multiwebsphere:
>> Dear nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, Open Nic (all),
>>
>> We would like to co-operate with Open Nic....that counts for
>> AltRootfoundation.org as well as Multiwebsphere.com
>>
>> But in order to cooperate, in Europe we have to know what you
>> want.....what you statutes are...with whom we kan make agreements.
>>
>> If Open Nic is a non-organisation, a kind of anarchistic group that
>> does formally not exist (no legal body) and where we do not know the
>> decision procedure, it is more difficult to cooperate.
>>
>> Is it correct open nic has appr. 1000 'members' who are not official
>> members, and that decision making goes by referendum? Ok, that is a
>> basis.
>>
>> Question 'from Europe': would you like to cooperate with us?
>>
>> Advantages I can imagine:
>> Altrootfoundation could 'cover' your existing extensions - you remain
>> the Intellectual Property owner of your extensions
>>
>> Multiwebsphere can decide to include or exclude your Open Nic
>> extensions in 1) MultiWebSphere - Brower 2) SEARZ search engine 3)
>> plug in for all browsers. Any preference?
>>
>> Altrootfoundation is not for profit, Multiwebsphere is.
>>
>> I am looking forward to reactions.
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Philippe Blankert
>> berlin AT multiwebphere.com
>> 12 nov 2012
>>
>>
>>> The way things get decided on OpenNIC is in a democratic vote. It does
>>> not matter how many people vote for something as long as there is more
>>> opposing votes then there are votes in favor of it. There are close to
>>> 300 people on the mailing list and all of them have a say in this.
>>> However, if they don't respond, then they are to be rated as
>>> abstentions, after a certain amount of time. And it's not just me and
>>> Alex H.  who object to altroot/mws association with OpenNIC.
>>>
>>> Now, if you would want to request an informal association with OpenNIC,
>>> you'll have to post a proposal for it and call for a vote. At least
>>> that's how i understand it.
>>>
>>> Am Montag, 12. November 2012 12:07:11 schrieb JP Blankert (Thuis PC):
>>>> Dear Alex, nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>, and other Open Nic
>>>> members,
>>>>
>>>> What is the decision procedure in an informal association as Open NIC,
>>>> re. exclsuion?
>>>>
>>>> All I mail are possibilities to generate and host domain names outside
>>>> ICANN. That is also exactly you objective.
>>>>
>>>> That is exactly the topic I am posting about, so we are fully in line!
>>>>
>>>> If a little majority of Open Nic (just a guess) would be 'jealous', is
>>>> not my therapeutic task to look at that.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Philippe Blankert
>>>> 12 nov. 2012 12 hrs 05 CEST
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> David "nanashiRei" Marner
>>> Founder of YaS-Online.net
>>> Service from Gamers, for Gamers.
>>>
>>> PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp
>>> Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp
>>>
>>
>
> --
> David "nanashiRei" Marner
> Founder of YaS-Online.net
> Service from Gamers, for Gamers.
>
> PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp
> Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp
>