Discuss mailing list

[Simon <simon AT hacknix.net>]

On 02/08/13 14:53, Aaron J. Angel wrote:

> That may be true, but there should be some sort of commitment to the
> group from the operator.  They are, after all, taking up a portion of
> our namespace to provide a service to their users.  We shouldn't have to
> put up with an operator taking up a portion of our namespace to provide
> non-functional service.

I agree. I'm not suggesting that it's completely without checks and
approvals, just playing devils advocate.

I think there needs to be a balance between control for stability's sake
and freedom and devolution of some power and responsibility from Opennic
to the TLD operator.

Simon