discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Coyo <coyo AT darkdna.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:48:58 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
May I suggest "TLD mounting?"
There is also the possibility of avoiding creating opennic tlds that
seem like future gtlds. examples of this may be 4-to-5-letter tlds,
obscure acronyms and NOT clever "domain hacks."
Just a suggestion. Chances are, things will continue as they are.
On 3/12/2014 7:51 AM, Peter Green wrote:
> 3. Provide a reasonable technological answer.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTILoqAAoJEDEXTUGm1DyUTcUH/jjd7FWYEMpUER3+ABXJD4k/
NGGVAp7dBViDWKJ3uw+IHJho+wolz0WXGFRHAolSY3+CY4NPwMfqUmnGhmQ+ZGP3
JuHnygfs4+SD71Mg6WBy78yDub/kLB828q+vUVkdvMinUx8gZrGTJPlBYjvILDFc
qCHUSaPUpjte5Thz0qnStNZz45vn0pXJjCO8cPLvF96NAZaBwF2Nr+c2cDLtm/h1
gWbbmEfssM+YtNougphJ29Gu09oT5r6JV1M+4lWxWCrG+TL3t8unFUC9XYQeNteA
Lt4Zn6bUk5wcA2GtOJiGxwxMQT6bZz4mWrFx+i7daYA4IOa3zoXALl/0HDyrpa0=
=fIHh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Julian DeMarchi, 03/04/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Daniel Quintiliani, 03/04/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Nova King, 03/04/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Tim Groeneveld, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Jon Hebb, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Jon Hebb, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Jeff Taylor, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Calum McAlinden, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Tim Groeneveld, 03/11/2014
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Nova King, 03/04/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Daniel Quintiliani, 03/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.