discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING

From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:39:33 -0700
Authentication-results: mx4.sourpuss.net; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx4.sourpuss.net 67E332D3AE

This is what my code changes would do as well... when building the root zone it should by default DROP any conflicting ICANN zones and prefer the OpenNic zones, then send me an email alerting to the fact that there has been a conflict.

Unfortunately I didn't have a chance to work on code over the weekend. Maybe today...

On 12/23/2014 08:31 AM, Brian Koontz wrote:

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 04:03:45PM -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:

The assumption here is that OpenNIC nameservers can (and do) prioritize ICANN results when conflicts occur, but I guess that may not necessarily be the case.

That is not an assumption...it's been long-standing OpenNIC policy, since
2000.

  --Brian


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Jeff Taylor, 12/30/2014
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Richard Lyons, 12/30/2014
    - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Administrador, 12/30/2014
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Calum McAlinden, 12/30/2014
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, David, 12/30/2014
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, David, 12/30/2014