Discuss mailing list

[Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>]

I somewhat doubt that they even care (or know) about our existence. Until (and unless) we manage to spread to (many) major ISPs' as default DNS root (and manage the bandwidth and necessity for way higher scalability and reliability with that) they won't (need to) care.

On 19.11.2016 0:34, Maiyannah Bishop wrote:

I imagine OpenNic's existence to begin with causes ICANN to have 'moments' ;-)

I could support a .o or other single-letter TLD.  I'm not sure how popular it would be, but that's no reason not to allow it, and I can find nothing in RFCs or otherwise in the approval track specifically regarding single-letter TLDs.  I think this seems "okay" - or at the very least, something they didn't think of - and if it is something they didn't consider, all the better for us.
-mb

On 2016-11-18 18:23, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:

I expect ICANN to throw a tantrum and declare all single-letter TLDs "reserved", but we should not care.  I could support a .o. TLD.

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org