Discuss mailing list

[Maiyannah Bishop <maiyannah.bishop AT postactiv.com>]

I don't see any compelling reason this couldn't happen in the IETF papers but I may be wrong.  I wonder at the utility, but it would certainly be novel.
-mb

On 2016-11-18 18:11, Jonah Aragon wrote:

I've been looking into single letter TLDs and there's both no technical reason they don't work and an incredibly low chance ICANN will start using them since they don't have any policies that allow their delegation, so they have those two things going for them.

I personally don't really like .onic but I support ".o" especially since it'd be a very OpenNIC specific domain as you mentioned.

Jonah

On Nov 18, 2016 5:05 PM, "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>
> According to https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/delegated-strings
>
> .dot and .open are ICANN.
>
> Not sure about .o and .n, might be something to think about, since OpenNIC runs separate TLDs having single-letter TLDs might be "OpenNIC-specific" and I would support a ".o" and ".n"
>
> I would support ".onic"
>
> I do not support ".on" due to the confusion with ".on.ca" that Maiyannah mentioned here.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature