Discuss mailing list

[Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>]

I expect ICANN to throw a tantrum and declare all single-letter TLDs 
"reserved", but we should not care.  I could support a .o. TLD.

Maiyannah Bishop wrote:
> I don't see any compelling reason this couldn't happen in the IETF 
> papers but I may be wrong.  I wonder at the utility, but it would 
> certainly be novel.
> -mb
>
> On 2016-11-18 18:11, Jonah Aragon wrote:
> > I've been looking into single letter TLDs and there's both no 
> > technical reason they don't work and an incredibly low chance ICANN 
> > will start using them since they don't have any policies that allow 
> > their delegation, so they have those two things going for them.
> >
> > I personally don't really like .onic but I support ".o" especially 
> > since it'd be a very OpenNIC specific domain as you mentioned.
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2016 5:05 PM, "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > According to 
> > https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/delegated-strings
> > >
> > > .dot and .open are ICANN.
> > >
> > > Not sure about .o and .n, might be something to think about, since 
> > OpenNIC runs separate TLDs having single-letter TLDs might be 
> > "OpenNIC-specific" and I would support a ".o" and ".n"
> > >
> > > I would support ".onic"
> > >
> > > I do not support ".on" due to the confusion with ".on.ca 
> > <http://on.ca>" that Maiyannah mentioned here.


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org