discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: "Aaron J. Angel" <aaron.angel AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:28:16 -0500
- Archived-at: <https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/discuss/2016-11/c17615df-9c3a-ef6a-a010-680627c8f1ae%40gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
On 11/18/2016 12:38 AM, Draago D. Bellasys wrote: The reason you were thinking NOT .onic is precisely why it should be considered! This seems suspiciously like a self-named TLD, which OpenNIC publicly states it does not support. On 11/17/2016 06:22 PM, Jonah Aragon
wrote:
4. VOTING
----------------
All matters of administrative importance will be voted upon
by members of the dotON domain registry. Motions will be passed
by a simple majority of votes (50% + 1).
A majority is more than half. I don't think you need to state 50% + |x| > 50%. As you say, it's simple. The dotON administration holds the right to veto any member
votes, in order to retain control of .on operation.
Why shouldn't the members be allowed to select a new administrator? |
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Tim Groeneveld, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, kevin, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, kevin, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Draago D. Bellasys, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Daniel Quintiliani, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Maiyannah Bishop, 11/18/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, spaesani, 11/19/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, kevin, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Aaron J. Angel, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jacob Bachmeyer, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Tim Groeneveld, 11/17/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Daniel Quintiliani, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Maiyannah Bishop, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jacob Bachmeyer, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Maiyannah Bishop, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Amunak, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Maiyannah Bishop, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jacob Bachmeyer, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Maiyannah Bishop, 11/18/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 11/18/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.