Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Aaron J. Angel" <aaron.angel AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .on TLD Proposal
  • Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:28:16 -0500
  • Archived-at: <https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/discuss/2016-11/c17615df-9c3a-ef6a-a010-680627c8f1ae%40gmail.com>
  • List-archive: <https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

On 11/18/2016 12:38 AM, Draago D. Bellasys wrote:
The reason you were thinking NOT .onic is precisely why it should be considered! 
This seems suspiciously like a self-named TLD, which OpenNIC publicly states it does not support.


On 11/17/2016 06:22 PM, Jonah Aragon wrote:
4. VOTING
----------------

All matters of administrative importance will be voted upon by members of the dotON domain registry. Motions will be passed by a simple majority of votes (50% + 1).

A majority is more than half. I don't think you need to state 50% + |x| > 50%. As you say, it's simple.

The dotON administration holds the right to veto any member votes, in order to retain control of .on operation.

Why shouldn't the members be allowed to select a new administrator?


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page