Discuss mailing list

[Simon Castano <netherland-office AT liberland.org>]

Note that our intention is to run a blockchain based TLD, implying that 
we will request a peering agreement with OpenNIC, rather than a genuine 
new TLD request. As I understand, vote for peering acceptance implies 
charter acceptance, sent for review prior to begin of the voting period.

We foresee formal request to be sent in the second quarter of next year.

Thanks again,

---
Simon

On 2016-12-12 22:00, Brian Koontz wrote:
> One of the requirements to vote in a new TLD is a charter. I would
> assume those who object to some aspect of the charter would not vote
> in favor of the new TLD.
>
> On Dec 12, 2016 1:57 PM, "Maiyannah Bishop"
> <maiyannah.bishop AT postactiv.com> wrote:
>
> > There's probably a couple specific points I'd disentangle from this
> > in terms of voting:
> >
> > [ ] acceptance of a new LL TLD
> > [ ] acceptance of monetization on the new domain
> >
> > Personally, I suspect a lot of people would support the former but
> > not the latter, based upon the general consensus I read here.
> > -mb
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org