Discuss mailing list

[JC <jc AT motorsports-x.com>]

What open nic needs is a massive user base.   Its hard to argue with 50 thousand users.   You get that,  then you go to congress.   

But by all. Means.  Write a letter.   Then you  have something to argue about.  Lol

On Dec 23, 2016 13:54, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:

I think it is a good idea to write to those
organizations, even just for the perspective
that a response might offer. However, I wonder
who would write such a letter. If you do it
then perhaps post the text here for comment.

As for ICANN watching this list, I'm not sure
if you're kidding or not, but I would suggest
that there is an extremely small chance that
it could be the case. :)

Regards,
        Ole


On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:41 +0100
Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net> wrote:

> If we are only given those options I vote to keep.
>
> I'd also, however, suggest keeping a back-up mirror for
> future-proofing (libre sounds great, but also like
> something ICANN would eventually register) - it's not
> like it costs us much. And I'd suggest both trying to get
> in touch with Amazon, EFF /and/ ICANN if just to see how
> (and whether at all) they'd respond. I /assume/ someone
> from ICANN is watching this list anyway.




>
> The thing is that if we bow now nothing stops ICANN from
> erasing us from existence by just giving people "our"
> TLDs over and over, it sets a fairly strong precedent.
> And we should also try to figure out a way to resolve
> further (future) conflicts - a way of forcing either
> OpenNIC or ICANN for resolution. And figure it out so
> that we don't break SSL (which may or may not be
> impossible).
>
> Amunak
>



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org