discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues

From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:47:27 -0700
Authentication-results: mx5.sourpuss.net; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx5.sourpuss.net 8996D2D3BB

There is no restriction on the length of a TLD. Note we already have .bbs, .dyn, .oss... and recently we added .o, so anything goes. Because of the extended voting period I called, there is still time for people to change their votes if another TLD option was more appealing.

On 12/22/2016 10:09 AM, nnnn20430 wrote:

1) drop 2) how about .lib ? or is it too short? if not .lib then .libre

Re: [opennic-discuss] letter writing. was Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, simple, 12/22/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, nnnn20430, 12/22/2016
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Jeff Taylor, 12/23/2016
    - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Jonah Aragon, 12/23/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Simon J. Castano, 12/22/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Arthur Garnier, 12/23/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Jeff Taylor, 12/23/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Richard Lyons, 12/23/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, spaesani, 12/24/2016
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Jonah Aragon, 12/24/2016
    - Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, spaesani, 12/24/2016
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote on .free issues, Jeff Taylor, 12/27/2016