Discuss mailing list

[Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>]

    Specifically for the TLD votes, not for anything else.  The
    reasoning was that a TLD is a pretty big deal, and we should expect
    a strong support behind any such additions.  Having a new TLD pass
    by a single vote does not show a strong interest by the community
    and probably means the charter needs to be refined.
    
    And honestly, if an idea is good then there's usually strong support
    behind it.  If half the group is on the fence or just doesn't like
    the idea, then something is wrong and it needs to be reconsidered.

On 07/26/2017 12:45 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:

That and why do we need a 2/3 majority for such a small community of people? That could make things complicated, and possibly result in a lot of good ideas (and good people) being thrown out.

--

-Dan Q

On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:51:39 +0000, Jonah Aragon <jonaharagon AT gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd say the voting period should be longer than 7 days, maybe 14 minimum,
> since many people don't check the list too often and we want to make sure
> we get as many people as possible to vote on major things like this.
>         
>         
>         
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>