Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

May be worth using the OpenNIC wiki like the other proposed TLDs did
so we have a specific version to reference, too. We've had issues in
the past with non-versioned revisions causing confusion. You can
reference the other TLDs as an example, such as
https://wiki.opennic.org/opennic/dot/o . I don't know if there's a
format/naming scheme for proposed TLDs vs. accepted TLDs.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org> 
wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 07:10 +0300, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:
>> I don`t understood what are you talking about. Please explain.
>>
>> I thought that people here know the ways how to open URLs that are not
>> resolved by theirs DNS servers.
>
> Yes, they know. But why should we change our (sometimes more complex)
> systems on random request? After all you're requesting. So why not just
> provide the information needed in a way that fits the workflow and
> avoids (a lot) extra work for others?
>
>
>> I already answered the question "purpose of this TLD?"
>
> I can't see an explanation on this in
> <433144db-1374-43c7-142a-b1dcdc8aa5b9 AT mega-net.ru> or any of it's
> replies.
>
>
>> and wrote the way
>> how to open my URLs if somebody is interested to view pages.
>
> A super complicated way, in contrast to just include those information
> with your request.
>
>
>> Or is there some new question that I didnt see ?
>
> At this point you sound like just being a trouble maker. If you're
> really interest in inclusion I very much recommend you to get back on
> the table and sit down. and then explain your request again including
> all the information OpenNIC needs.
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> PS: And please stop that TOFU.
>
>
>> On 18.09.2017 07:01, vv AT cgs.pw wrote:
>> > Not worth the trouble for my particular setup.
>> > Is there some reason you don't want to make
>> > this convenient?
>> >
>> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:21:47 +0300
>> > "Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru> wrote:
>> >
>> >> You can if you want to. Because I wrote NS servers list
>> >> is the first letter.
>> >>
>> >> So a little change in your settings and you can browse it
>> >> without any problem and than change it back.
>> >>
>> >> On 18.09.2017 06:03, Christopher wrote:
>> >>> You do realize we cannot go to "http://www.rus/"; since
>> >>> it's not in OpenNIC yet?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
>> >>> <dn AT mega-net.ru <mailto:dn AT mega-net.ru>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>     Hi.
>> >>>
>> >>>     It`s written on page http://www.rus/
>> >>>
>> >>>>     dot RUS is targeted to those who may want an
>> >>>> alternate domain to .ru
>> >>>     Like a:
>> >>>
>> >>>>     .oz <https://wiki.opennic.org/opennic/dot/oz>
>> >>>>  2012-06-11 opennic.oz <http://opennic.oz/>
>> >>>>  Australian websites (alt-ccTLD)
>> >>>     Primarily this is TLD for Russian people and then
>> >>> for everyone who want domain in russia zone.
>> >>>
>> >>>     On 17.09.2017 21:20, Jonah Aragon wrote:
>> >>>>     What is the intended purpose of this TLD? Please
>> >>>> send a charter describing everything we'd need to know
>> >>>> before we can vote.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     On Sep 17, 2017 1:00 PM, "Dmitry S. Nikolaev"
>> >>>> <dn AT mega-net.ru <mailto:dn AT mega-net.ru>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>         Yes, I really want to try to do new TLD. TLD I
>> >>>> want is *.RUS*.
>
>
> --
> Philipp.
>  (Rah of PH2)
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>