Discuss mailing list

[Max Bellasys <info AT bellasys.com>]

On a technical platform (creating a multi-system-resolver) I think this is an 
excellent suggestion. Integration is the opposite of fragmentation, and it is 
possible to achieve inter-operability between disparate systems, of course. 

Has anyone from OpenNIC ever tried to achieve joint-DNS resolution? I think 
this is why a technology solution seems more realistic in the immediate 
sense, because if I’m not mistaken the reason the OpenNIC exists is due to 
lack of interchange with ICANN and its control of TLD and name server 
resolution. 

Also, since I joined this discussion fairly late, is it possible to very 
succinctly address the reason why OpenNIC is seriously considering 
Incorporation or formalizing its organization?  Incorporation (or Non-Profit) 
has to do more than just facilitate funding, because such things can be 
driven by rolling up the sleeves and creating campaigns to do so. 

I’m not asking for a full philosophy here, just a nutshell of the present 
query, because it’s clear I’m missing the crux of the issues. 

Thanks in advance

~Max Bellasys

 
On Dec 28, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Riley Baird <riley AT openmailbox.org> wrote:

>> For my part I desire to product a resolver that works with OpenNIC, ICANN, 
>> INAIC, Name.Space, Unifiedroot, etc. and is not dependent on a single 
>> root.  I had a rootless resolver and have withdrawn it as it is being 
>> updated, but it should reappear.  This is my attempt at a technical 
>> response to a political issue.  I do not need to be the only one doing so 
>> and I welcome others to do the same or similar.  We don’t need just one 
>> way to do things.
> 
> Apologies for taking this off-topic, but I think that it would be a good
> idea to see if OpenNIC could attempt to do a merger with these other
> roots. There's no point in unnecessary fragmentation.
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org