Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Establishment of an OpenNIC foundation using OpenNIC funds

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Establishment of an OpenNIC foundation using OpenNIC funds


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Riley Baird <riley AT openmailbox.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Establishment of an OpenNIC foundation using OpenNIC funds
  • Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:15:28 +1100

OpenNIC has done joint-DNS resolution with the "New Nations" TLDs. You
can access .uu, .ku, .te and .ti domains though OpenNIC's DNS servers.

On 29/12/14 12:38, Max Bellasys wrote:
> On a technical platform (creating a multi-system-resolver) I think this is
> an excellent suggestion. Integration is the opposite of fragmentation, and
> it is possible to achieve inter-operability between disparate systems, of
> course.
>
> Has anyone from OpenNIC ever tried to achieve joint-DNS resolution? I think
> this is why a technology solution seems more realistic in the immediate
> sense, because if I’m not mistaken the reason the OpenNIC exists is due to
> lack of interchange with ICANN and its control of TLD and name server
> resolution.
>
> Also, since I joined this discussion fairly late, is it possible to very
> succinctly address the reason why OpenNIC is seriously considering
> Incorporation or formalizing its organization? Incorporation (or
> Non-Profit) has to do more than just facilitate funding, because such
> things can be driven by rolling up the sleeves and creating campaigns to do
> so.
>
> I’m not asking for a full philosophy here, just a nutshell of the present
> query, because it’s clear I’m missing the crux of the issues.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> ~Max Bellasys
>
>
> On Dec 28, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Riley Baird <riley AT openmailbox.org> wrote:
>
>>> For my part I desire to product a resolver that works with OpenNIC,
>>> ICANN, INAIC, Name.Space, Unifiedroot, etc. and is not dependent on a
>>> single root. I had a rootless resolver and have withdrawn it as it is
>>> being updated, but it should reappear. This is my attempt at a technical
>>> response to a political issue. I do not need to be the only one doing so
>>> and I welcome others to do the same or similar. We don’t need just one
>>> way to do things.
>>
>> Apologies for taking this off-topic, but I think that it would be a good
>> idea to see if OpenNIC could attempt to do a merger with these other
>> roots. There's no point in unnecessary fragmentation.
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page