Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [SPAM] Re: DNS selection: trusted DNS

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [SPAM] Re: DNS selection: trusted DNS


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Verax <verax AT 8chan.co>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [SPAM] Re: DNS selection: trusted DNS
  • Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 00:04:26 -0500

Just to stuff in my 2 cents: why would you log queries anyways? I log
operational stuff, none of that is compromising to clients. Logging
queries seems expensive and pointless.

Unless there's something I'm not thinking of.

--Verax

vv AT cgs.pw wrote:
> I agree that anonymity is an option. But
> like I said, it is the no-logging which
> is asked for by users. There have been
> very many questions from people who want
> to make sure. I don't think transparency
> (although of concern for people like you
> and I) is even thought about by most end
> users. It is always the no-logging which
> is the draw. And I understand why. It is
> the one thing which is generally mentioned
> when security is the topic, and it is most
> often concerns about security that bring
> people here.
>
> ~ Ole
>
>
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 04:30:53 +0000
> Jonah Aragon <jonaharagon AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A good amount of both Tier 1 and Tier 2 servers state
>> they keep logs, and keeping logs is even a topic in the
>> Tier 2 operations wiki page. OpenNIC's main pulling point
>> is that we operate completely transparently and
>> democratically, not anonymously. However there are
>> definitely servers that keep only anonymized or no logs,
>> and that's displayed clearly on the servers page.
>>
>> For what it's worth, the homepage says "You can choose
>> the DNS server you connect to, what country it’s located
>> in, and how much logging is done with OpenNIC," which
>> makes it clear enough I think. Anonymity is an option
>> with OpenNIC, not a policy.
>>
>> Jonah
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about the consensus here, but it
>>> is clear that most users come to OpenNIC specifically
>>> for the non-logging.
>>>
>>> Of course each operator can do what they want
>>> as long as it is marked on the list. On that
>>> note, perhaps the main web page "Get Started Now!"
>>> results should also be clear.
>>>
>>> ~ Ole Juul
>>>
>>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:20:35 -0500
>>> Maiyannah Bishop <maiyannah AT highlandarrow.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's the general consensus on logging policies for
>>>> the nameservers anyways?
>>>> -mb
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-12-03 16:17, Jonah Aragon wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> 1. Awesome! You can list your servers by logging in
>>>>> with your member account at
>>>>> https://servers.opennicproject.org/ and there's an
>>>>> "Add new server" button to the top of the page.
>>>>> You'll have to enter a lot of related information
>>>>> like your logging policies so keep those in mind.
>>>>> Also you should test your server at
>>>>> http://report.opennicproject.org/t2log/test.php if
>>>>> you haven't already.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page