Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <vv AT cgs.pw>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL
  • Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:34:20 -0800

How many companies use OpenDNS servers?

On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:36:51 +0000
Hamza <bouaouda.h AT gmail.com> wrote:

> Basically, any enough large company which would use your
> DNS will hit the ratelimit. I would prefer to let them
> support the service cost and provide support instead of
> blacklisting.
>
> That's not in OpenNIC philosophy to block an user without
> any proofs of malicious activity, I believe.
>
>
> Le ven. 9 déc. 2016 à 21:34, Jonah Aragon
> <jonaharagon AT gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Because DNS access is a basic right and we shouldn't
> > rate limit it. Nobody wants to, or should charge for
> > DNS access itself.
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> > P.S. that being said, if you exceeded a certain amounts
> > of requests per second, I'd probably blacklist you. But
> > that's a whole different story about attacks, not
> > monetization.
> >
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2016 2:29 PM, "Hamza" <bouaouda.h AT gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Why not charge when an IP is exceeding a number of
> > requests per day ?
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 9 déc. 2016 à 21:27, Jonah Aragon
> > <jonaharagon AT gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > I agree, I personally wouldn't start charging for my
> > domains. I'm just saying people's expectations =/=
> > OpenNIC policy, and we should allow operators that
> > option if they so choose.
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2016 2:19 PM, "Maiyannah Bishop"
> > <maiyannah.bishop AT postactiv.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, it's a service offered by other TLDs for free, so
> > people would
> >
> > expect a new OpenNIC TLD to be similar, whereas if
> > you're offering
> >
> > something new that's paid, there would be no
> > expectation.
> >
> >
> > -mb
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2016-12-09 15:16, Jonah Aragon
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree, although I fail to see how domain
> >
> > registration isn't an added service, as the primary
> > service
> >
> > provided for free is DNS resolution, not domain
> > registrations.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> >
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> >
> >
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >
> >
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> >
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page