Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Hunter 9999 <mail AT hunter-9999.de>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Domains Registration Fee - Liberland domains .LL
  • Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:50:00 +0100

No, that's not correct.
As said before we are OpenNIC and not OpenDNS, so our primate service also
includes domain registration



Am 9. Dezember 2016 21:16:19 MEZ schrieb Jonah Aragon <jonaharagon AT gmail.com>:
>I agree, although I fail to see how domain registration isn't an added
>service, as the primary service provided for free is DNS resolution,
>not
>domain registrations.
>
>Jonah
>
>
>On Dec 9, 2016 2:14 PM, "Maiyannah Bishop"
><maiyannah.bishop AT postactiv.com>
>wrote:
>
>Honestly I think if people were to charge for things, the best way to
>go is
>for value-add services (things that come to mind: support services,
>API
>access for people who developed APIs, using your nameservers as
>authoratative and thus storing the zones, etc)
>
>-mb
>
>
>On 2016-12-09 15:09, Jonah Aragon wrote:
>
>I think we've all established the homepage needs updating.... That
>being
>said you're definitely right, you can't charge for access to public T2
>servers, and not for any listed on the official servers page.
>
>At a technical level you COULD charge for DNS access, but you wouldn't
>be
>listed on the servers page and the practice would be frowned upon.
>
>I think we're taking this in a whole different direction though, nobody
>wants to charge for DNS access, only for domain names on the network.
>Completely different.
>
>Jonah



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page