Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

No ISP in the free world does this with their DNS servers. Why should we?

--

-Dan Q


On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:58:11 -0500, kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:

> The problem here was, spamhaus painted ALL opennic peers with a broad
> brush.  So those that won't filter anything, which I fully support,
> could potentially affect everyone.
> 
> As many, if not most of us here appear to believe, this project has
> always been about freedom with collaboration via a touch of democracy
> (voting) thrown in. And I believe that everyone can (and will) do as
> they please.
> 
> But...  and so to repeat, those that filter nothing (including malware)
> could affect all of us.  And like the .free domain, I don't care and
> would have preferred to keep it under openNIC.  But, not everyone
> agrees with what I think. lol  So filtering, at least for malware,
> certainly could be suggested as a strong guideline or recommendation. 
> And my opinion with anything else, obviously leave that to the
> individual T2 hosts.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On Sun, 2019-06-30 at 12:05 +0200, Amunak wrote:
> > Why? The T2 server list is capable of displaying and filtering
> > pretty 
> > much anything. Some T2 server providers may choose to run more 
> > blacklists, some may choose to run none. That's their decision and
> > as 
> > long as they say so in their server's description then more power to 
> > everyone - the whole point of sharing T2 servers is to provide a
> > service 
> > to other users who have an interest in that service *with that 
> > particular configuration*. Same goes for logging and such.
> > 
> > Sure, don't show it on the homepage among "recommended servers" but 
> > there's no reason to essentially blacklist those servers and
> > operators 
> > from OpenNic.
> > 
> > Amunak
> > 
> > On 30.06.2019 1:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> > > Jeff Taylor wrote:
> > > > It could relate to any domains, opennic or icann.  And I'm not
> > > > saying 
> > > > we WILL, I'm just saying we COULD have that option.  Like with
> > > > the 
> > > > spamhaus listings, use of this would be up to the individual T2 
> > > > operators.  At the moment there is nothing planned, I just wrote
> > > > the 
> > > > API so we could expand on its use later if we chose to.
> > > 
> > > I suggest a policy restricting the use of non-malware blacklists
> > > to 
> > > private T2 servers.  In other words, T2 servers using blacklists
> > > for 
> > > any category other than malware would not be eligible to be listed
> > > in 
> > > the public directory.
> > > 
> > > We might even want to require public T2 servers to blacklist known 
> > > malware domains, but that is sure to be highly controversial.
> > > Should 
> > > we censor ransomware?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- Jacob
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> -- 
> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kevinrattai/
> 
> https://winnipegcryptoconference.com/
> 
> https://github.com/krattai
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org