discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: "Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:27:38 +0300
- Organization: OOO Meganet-2003
We all die ! What a great news :))) Let`s delete all and go drink
beer because world is cruel. ICANN can take domain but they can`t take freedom and brain. They close one domain - we can open two new domains and so on. I agree, that opennic SHOULD NOT delete .free. Let people choose what they want. If opennic become commercial company, so what will be the difference to ICANN, RU CENTER and others ? I think taht all you are talking about and all i heard is a responsibility, responsibility for the project that you start. So if you can`t support than don`t start project. Yes, it`s hobby but need to be responsible hobby, because it`s affects not only you. Or maybe think about how to attract sponsors to the project. Commercial or something like that. So the project can pay himself to the developers and maintainers. "Opennic are not organized" - for now i already agree with that. With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev Moscow, Russia phone: +7 (499) 678 8007 [ext. 6003] fax: +7 (499) 678 8007 [ext. 7777] www: http://www.mega-net.ru mail: dnikolaev AT mega-net.ru SIP URI: dnikolaev AT sip.mega-net.ru || dn AT sip.mega-net.ru On 13.09.2017 12:48, 6161 wrote:
OpenNIC is doomed, I'm telling you all.
ICANN can wipe us out in a day if they want to, the only
reason they don't is because we are no threat at all. With the
new gTLDs being here, .bbs, .chan, .dyn, .fur, .geek, .glue,
.gopher, .indy, .libre, .neo, .null, .oss, .oz, .parody and
.pirate could be taken over by them tomorrow. (The only
exemption might be .o because it is so short they might not
register it, not that one domain really matters.) If they do
register any of our domains, we will bow down to them just like
we did after they robbed us of .free.
I had registered a .free domain. Nobody told me that it would
be lost. I discovered that by chance when I clicked through the
mailing list, which I was not subscribed to before. Apparently,
it was expected of domain owners to be on the mailing list. Do
any of you think average domain holder Joe wants to read through
all of this? No, of course not, the least Joe can expect is that
someone writes him an email when they cancel his domain. Do you
think Joe trusts OpenNIC after canceling his domain? Maybe he
really liked .free. OpenNIC is not suitable for the masses.
Why are we like this? Because we are not organized. I hate to
point fingers, but for the sake of making this point look at the
projects of the maintainer of .o: The registration system is
down after it has already launched. (Is it down again or is it
still down?) There was supposed to be a CA which he was in
charge of, I have not heard anything about that ever since. Why
are all of these projects dying? I cannot say for sure, but I
assume it is because he has more important stuff to do in his
life. And you know what? I do not blame him for letting these
projects die, not at all. It's a hobby, not a job. Nobody pays
him, so it has to be done in free time. This guy owes me
nothing.
To compete with ICANN we would need to be a company who has
dedicated developers and maintainers. We would have to resist
against them, push them back when they try to register one of
our domains.
To be a commercialized company, we would have to make money
somehow, likely take it for registrations. This forfeits all of
our ideals. I am sorry.
-------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org |
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/09/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/12/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, vv, 09/12/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, me, 09/12/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, vv, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Christopher, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, vv, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, 6161, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Daniel Quintiliani, 09/13/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Grant Baron, 09/14/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, me, 09/14/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Amunak, 09/14/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/15/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/15/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Al Beano, 09/15/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/15/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Zubin Talib, 09/15/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/15/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, vv, 09/12/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/12/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic project promotion, Dmitry S. Nikolaev, 09/09/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.