discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 02:19:47 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XGQoj1yB/B06cw/vqvSZROAxxCOO+iY0sfE7Sg4KUP+m1vDqeGzbe3gcvvJYrZNq4N i6SeOjnPBxaSVaQQ4YkPNvuSrq1C7y+mmeKL+snC/8K2oU//lFuTTU6LI6VZpEHrjhR9 4PzqiG0GWUgU+Edh6RgZk4/91zrkivecIZyZQ=
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
I see it as supply and demand of sorts
I recognize some of those domains from two years ago, had a site on
mutiple tlds, automatically removed in a year, they don't point
anywhere now, the people who got it saw a supply, they didn't use it,
while the resources aren't much, the point is gone if there is no real
demand, if it's really of that much value, prove it, get a domain,
make a killer site.
I see this as a dare, justify the time and effort, resources (however
small, it's not 0)
I'm running enough sites as is, so I won't be taking this dare.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> For the record, running a TLD does not require much in the way of resources,
> other than times like this when I'm trying to clean up the mess of abandoned
> domain registries. The queries to a T1 require very minimal bandwidth, so
> that is not an issue here.
>
> My only concern in bringing up this discussion is that .parody is completely
> unused. If there had been any functioning targets to the existing domains,
> I never would have brought up the issue.
>
>
> On 12/28/2010 04:15 PM, Travis McCrea wrote:
>>
>> I am just thinking what if only 2-3 people register domains on .parody
>> even after we grow more. Why would we dedicate resources which could be
>> used to create a more stable infrastructure to a domain that very few
>> people are actually going to take advantage of?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC root structure was Is it time to kill .parody?, Julian De Marchi, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC root structure was Is it time to kill .parody?, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC root structure was Is it time to kill .parody?, Julian De Marchi, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC root structure was Is it time to kill .parody?, Jeff Taylor, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Travis McCrea, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Zach Gibbens, 12/29/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Jeff Taylor, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Michael Mace, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Is it time to kill .parody?, Michael Mace, 12/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.