Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] The website

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] The website


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] The website
  • Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:15:38 -0500

Did someone /really/ ask what was wrong with gnupg.org?? This is the problem
with letting IT people come up with design instead of leaving it to
designers. Yes, I can build a website with the output of every server, we can
do ping times and reports. The average person doesn't want that though.

The average person wants to come to OpenNICproject.org and see:
1) What is OpenNIC in under 200 words
2) A Quick Feature List
3) How to install it on my computer, explaining it as though I was a 5 year
old

no more, no less. If people want more, we provide them links to get the
additional information they need.

Also Brian you keep talking about how there are all these reports and things
that we pull from the wiki and that's your reasoning for using the wiki
software we have -- wiki's are not supposed to be for statically generated
content. We could build that into the website (very easily).

What we need the wiki for is organizational things: Projects, Teams, Guides,
Development, etc. Wikis are supposed to be editable by people and provide a
way to easily share information that can be built upon by other people, why
would we want the wiki to share statistics?

Guillaume Parent wrote:
> It looks like every GNU project's website - Ugly as hell.
>
> But it's a matter of opinion, so there's no need to debate it.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, mike <mike AT pikeaero.com
> <mailto:mike AT pikeaero.com>> wrote:
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/05/2012 12:29 AM, nanashiRei wrote:
> >
> > Am 05.12.2012 03:40, schrieb mike:
> >>
> >> On 12/04/2012 08:55 PM, Brian Koontz wrote:
> >>> You all want pretty? Make a pretty website.
> >>
> >> I think that sums it up nicely, Brian.
> >>
> >> I was trying to think of a nice way to say that, but I think you
> >> nailed it.
> >>
> >
> > Wow.No, not pretty, but also not like http://www.gnupg.org/ either.
> > We are a service that wants users, not a tool or dev-news blog.
> > That's why i jumped on this.
> >
>
> What's wrong with gnupg.org <http://gnupg.org>? It's
> multi-language, has mirrors, is well
> organized, easy to navigate, loads fast, easy on the eyes, few
> distractions. Seems almost ideal to me.
>
>
> - --
> Regards,
>
> Mike Sharkey,CEO
> Pike Aerospace Research Corp. (Pike Aero)
> 420 Cross Street
> Sudbury, Ontario
> Canada P3E-3W1
>
> P:1+(705)586-2255
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQv2xbAAoJEA7EcEr0emgfJYcH/1YGyeEVaQ1/k9DumpnADiZq
> S5ZJbfwnRVXw1yKfNQDwSmYmB7iStA+fWEV4V7jIZ4JxuDlFmwgLpdE9IkY4WgUr
> AobOdsyEID67yDhNYOnGNSnCSjlQs18tQb0lwS8n0TDg7iRvkzoa/3DTgpWpNGq7
> fM4vZ7iBDxuUeUmJbhRxvn4R/S17hm6ssWQyndJrdqhlnH5ylsJ7U98nfmGqAfKi
> Dko+AoxGQiaofJL4937gjnUfbUIhfSTp0W0usL5Db9tg8hQp8VGeOzlBrFKXxBsi
> hnuRTwT4YFkuGTD7DNO+VBTyJiCFiPeQHcLswWzf8+czbgtiTytdBXUv2P6Xs6E=
> =sF/2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page