Discuss mailing list

[Cédric <origin AT killy.net>]

So what ?

For me, a charter is a general guideline for a TLD, no more. If you don't want any kind of guideline, you don't have to impose a charter, but just a "description" of the TLD. I think we didn't really understood the real meaning of what you call a charter. So, for us, we can keep only the description, the general purpose of the TLD and go forward.

Cédric

Le 27 févr. 2011 à 01:51, teamcoltra AT gmail.com a écrit :

Example: oss should be for open source projects and such but if an opensource project is something like LOIC or some program that spams hate speech... then that should be allowed.

sent from my mobile

On 2011-02-26 4:47 PM, "teamcoltra AT gmail.com" <teamcoltra AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe I will be alone but I will never vote for any tld that restricts
> speech further than keeping the namespace categorized. Like "this should be
> loosly regionally based"
>
> sent from my mobile
> On 2011-02-26 4:42 PM, "Zach Gibbens" <infocop411 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, considering this is a regional TLD, and France has even stricter
>> laws on hate speech than we do, I think it's good to emphasize that, but
>> netiquette is broader a term than hate speech and racism.
>>
>> On 26/02/11 19:37, teamcoltra AT gmail.com wrote:
>>> Exactly... I don't feel that protecting a tld against racism is within
> the
>>> ideals of opennic. Free speech is always free speech.
>>>
>>> sent from my mobile
>>> On 2011-02-26 3:59 PM, "Cédric" <origin AT killy.net> wrote:
>>>> Our only goal with these limitations (netiquette, non-commercial) was to
>>> protect the .BZH from any kind of racism, profit-use, and so on ... but,
>>> it's just like all the charters : it's a sort of guideline, not a law
> with
>>> the associated control you could imagine.
>>>>
>>>> It never was our intention to artificially limit the use of the .BZH. So
>>> if you think theses limitations can bring some kind of "censorship",
>>> "stylish guide", or "only politically correct sites" (sorry for the
>>> word-to-word translate from the french, hope this is understandable), we
> can
>>> remove them. As I already said before, no problem for us.
>>>>
>>>> Cédric
>>>>
>>>> Le 27 févr. 2011 à 00:19, Jeff Taylor a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see where you are reading any rules regarding ethics? The way I
>>> read his original charter, it sounds like they are focusing on discussion
>>> that relates to a particular culture and/or region.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the ads and donation buttons... to me this is just trying to
> limit
>>> sites that are *intentionally* for-profit. I agree it could use some
>>> clarification to avoid future disagreements, but it doesn't sound like he
> is
>>> trying to limit donations to a website that are funding either the site
>>> hosting or a cause that the site is promoting. Maybe Cedric can provide
> more
>>> clarification on this, and we can help suggest rules that are more
> specific?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature