Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "teamcoltra AT gmail.com" <teamcoltra AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter
  • Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:47:02 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=spbAxkc3nQg9MicSUNVYf79Mg1802xS5RA8fpZXyTzQD/AKZbG8qJKJZYx79LuYyUU W+piIDtDxQ58M16B0lywOrqKwe8lHz5SGomieqeSzZtQba3mRDvACRgnDXQu9BSbl9iG ozE7edkUNOa+JW7nJDlCwhTyqz6iIUtmIJz6o=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

Maybe I will be alone but I will never vote for any tld that restricts speech further than keeping the namespace categorized. Like "this should be loosly regionally based"

sent from my mobile

On 2011-02-26 4:42 PM, "Zach Gibbens" <infocop411 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, considering this is a regional TLD, and France has even stricter
> laws on hate speech than we do, I think it's good to emphasize that, but
> netiquette is broader a term than hate speech and racism.
>
> On 26/02/11 19:37, teamcoltra AT gmail.com wrote:
>> Exactly... I don't feel that protecting a tld against racism is within the
>> ideals of opennic. Free speech is always free speech.
>>
>> sent from my mobile
>> On 2011-02-26 3:59 PM, "Cédric" <origin AT killy.net> wrote:
>>> Our only goal with these limitations (netiquette, non-commercial) was to
>> protect the .BZH from any kind of racism, profit-use, and so on ... but,
>> it's just like all the charters : it's a sort of guideline, not a law with
>> the associated control you could imagine.
>>>
>>> It never was our intention to artificially limit the use of the .BZH. So
>> if you think theses limitations can bring some kind of "censorship",
>> "stylish guide", or "only politically correct sites" (sorry for the
>> word-to-word translate from the french, hope this is understandable), we can
>> remove them. As I already said before, no problem for us.
>>>
>>> Cédric
>>>
>>> Le 27 févr. 2011 à 00:19, Jeff Taylor a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I don't see where you are reading any rules regarding ethics? The way I
>> read his original charter, it sounds like they are focusing on discussion
>> that relates to a particular culture and/or region.
>>>>
>>>> As for the ads and donation buttons... to me this is just trying to limit
>> sites that are *intentionally* for-profit. I agree it could use some
>> clarification to avoid future disagreements, but it doesn't sound like he is
>> trying to limit donations to a website that are funding either the site
>> hosting or a cause that the site is promoting. Maybe Cedric can provide more
>> clarification on this, and we can help suggest rules that are more specific?
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page