Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .BZH TLD Charter
  • Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:42:11 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version :content-type; b=HrE+qoCE/Ho3OnLj+V3pU/4td0etBg9iLbfGiveLn5ksfAxlWALx821rC2GVgTukuf fSNKpVfU+s4LiHvd0CAhvppbH5sfH5HjMdWKDYGa+xmGKNjZEpFxkSCySkQmgVHe0pr5 FbwKkmvvD/M8D3hcrfV4orAa5KVNYVsFK7lwI=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

Well, considering this is a regional TLD, and France has even stricter
laws on hate speech than we do, I think it's good to emphasize that, but
netiquette is broader a term than hate speech and racism.

On 26/02/11 19:37, teamcoltra AT gmail.com wrote:
> Exactly... I don't feel that protecting a tld against racism is within the
> ideals of opennic. Free speech is always free speech.
>
> sent from my mobile
> On 2011-02-26 3:59 PM, "Cédric" <origin AT killy.net> wrote:
>> Our only goal with these limitations (netiquette, non-commercial) was to
> protect the .BZH from any kind of racism, profit-use, and so on ... but,
> it's just like all the charters : it's a sort of guideline, not a law with
> the associated control you could imagine.
>>
>> It never was our intention to artificially limit the use of the .BZH. So
> if you think theses limitations can bring some kind of "censorship",
> "stylish guide", or "only politically correct sites" (sorry for the
> word-to-word translate from the french, hope this is understandable), we can
> remove them. As I already said before, no problem for us.
>>
>> Cédric
>>
>> Le 27 févr. 2011 à 00:19, Jeff Taylor a écrit :
>>
>>> I don't see where you are reading any rules regarding ethics? The way I
> read his original charter, it sounds like they are focusing on discussion
> that relates to a particular culture and/or region.
>>>
>>> As for the ads and donation buttons... to me this is just trying to limit
> sites that are *intentionally* for-profit. I agree it could use some
> clarification to avoid future disagreements, but it doesn't sound like he is
> trying to limit donations to a website that are funding either the site
> hosting or a cause that the site is promoting. Maybe Cedric can provide more
> clarification on this, and we can help suggest rules that are more specific?
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page