discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Tim Groeneveld <tim AT timg.ws>
- To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 18:10:39 +1100
maybe this could happen [grandfathering of the domains] but I doubt it highly. I have fought the good fight, but nothing happened.
Dear Lord God Almighty, please let this (and .biz before it) be a lesson that we need a much better legal protections put in place if we want to seriously operate in this space.
If we can't or don't want to do this, we should throw our hands up and quit now.
Kind Regards,
Tim
---- On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:07:08 +1100 riley AT openmailbox.org wrote ----
---- On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:07:08 +1100 riley AT openmailbox.org wrote ----
I doubt that the creation of .ing is intentionally trying to derail the
OpenNIC project. More likely, it was just a lack of concern for it,
perhaps through ignorance.
The entity which filed the application for .ing is Charleston Road
Registry, which is basically Google, but with a name change to meet
ICANN policy.
How many .ing domains are there? Do you think that Google could be
convinced to "grandfather" the already registered domains?
On 24/12/14 09:15, David wrote:
> We should stick to opennic should be following the to the letter their
> own policy that was establish a long time ago. I smell a big rotten
> rotten fish in trying to derail the opennic project. We should support
> Our leaders and supporters of opennic. ICANN it is corporate piranha, in
> other words Government greed in neutralizing the net..
>
> On 12/23/2014 11:45 PM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
>> In case you forgot, this issue was already discussed on the list earlier
>> this year, and the general consensus was that nobody had enough interest
>> to put forth the effort of contacting the EFF or anyone else. If we
>> were going to fight for it, that would have been the time -- when ICANN
>> first announced the possibility of using .ing. At this point its too
>> late, it's a done deal and any credibility we might have had towards a
>> claim is gone through lack of action.
>>
>> But hey, if you want to hold me personally responsible for the loss of
>> the zone, more power to ya.
>>
>>
>> On 12/20/2014 01:15 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>> I really think someone should contact the EFF about this issue. I
>>> don't personally care about my .ing domains as they're just redirects,
>>> but if everyone caves in like Jeff is, they're eventually gonna go
>>> after Julian, and if Julian doesn't fight back, OpenNIC will be gone.
>>> -- -Dan Q
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, David, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Jeff Taylor, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, David, 12/24/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, David, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Riley Baird, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Jeff Taylor, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Riley Baird, 12/23/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Call for vote to drop ING, Anner van Hardenbroek, 12/24/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.