Discuss mailing list

["Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru>]

Hi.

Can anyone else say something about new-nations.net ?

Also:

On 24.09.2017 17:05, Al Beano wrote:

If we start allowing them, everyone will want one for their country and people who just want a TLD will be able to get one with relatively little real work (and therefore won't think much of it).

On 24.09.2017 20:27, vv AT cgs.pw wrote:

I too am a little confused about the idea of a ccTLD.

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Dmitry S. Nikolaev <dn AT mega-net.ru> wrote:

And why not ? What are you afraid of ?

So Ole (vv AT cgs.pw) and Al Beano (albino AT autistici.org) can you answer ?

Thanks.

With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
virus_net

On 26.09.2017 19:18, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:

Hmmm... are you sure ? What a news for me ! Separate projects but with obligations to each other ?

If you sure, so than they can take and other TLD`s also.
I find this post https://www.new-nations.net/en/discussion/show/id/239 about .o TLD

If I understand right they now have only:
- .uu
- .ti
- .te
-.ku   

Maybe then it is worth combining OpenNIC efforts with them ? I think it`s better.

P.S. I don`t see .RUS there or even suggestion of it.

With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
virus_net

On 26.09.2017 18:31, Amrit Panesar wrote:

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Dmitry S. Nikolaev <dn AT mega-net.ru> wrote:

And why not ? What are you afraid of ? 

Conflicts with New Nations is one that comes to mind

https://www.new-nations.net/en/about/showpage

Alternative cc-tlds generally go through New Nations.

I could be wrong, but as far as I know, OpenNIC still has active peering agreements with New Nations.

I'm not aware of how active their community is, but New Nations seems more appropriate for an alternative cc-tld

--

Amrit Panesar

http://amrit.be